Utility of positive controls in assessing assay sensitivity in ICH S7B and ICH E14 guidance for evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation.

Positive controls have often been used in nonclinical and clinical cardiovascular safety studies to evaluate the study's assay sensitivity with respect to drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval of the electrocardiogram (ECG). If the study is able to detect such QT prolongation by the control, then a finding of negative QT effect of comparable size for the test drug will constitute evidence that the test drug does not in fact prolong the QT interval by the amount of regulatory concern. Current regulatory guidance regarding QT interval prolongation includes ICH S7B (nonclinical) and ICH E14 (clinical). However, the underlying null hypothesis settings of the two documents are quite different. This paper quantitatively evaluates the utility of positive controls in nonclinical and clinical studies in which a test drug and a positive control are simultaneously assessed in a study. The results show that positive controls, when powered at 80%, can be beneficial in 58% of nonclinical QT studies with Prob(S)=0.8; when powered at 90%, positive controls can be beneficial 73% of clinical QT studies with Prob(S)=0.9, where Prob(S) represents the probability of success with no QT risk at the stage of development.

The combined use of ibutilide as an active control with intensive electrocardiographic sampling and signal averaging as a sensitive method to assess the effects of tadalafil on the human QT interval.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate effects of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), on the QT interval. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is common in men with ED. Men with cardiovascular disease and ED may have decreased cardiac repolarization reserve. METHODS: Effects of tadalafil (100 mg by mouth), ibutilide (0.002 mg/kg intravenously), and placebo on the QT interval in healthy men were compared (placebo and tadalafil [n = 90], with a subset [n = 61] receiving all treatments; mean age 30 years, range 18 to 53 years). Electrocardiographic sampling was done for two days before treatment and on treatment days. The QT was corrected for RR interval with five correction methods, including an individual correction (QTcI). Plasma concentrations of tadalafil were measured to evaluate concentration-QT effect relationships. RESULTS: At the time corresponding to maximum plasma concentration of tadalafil, the mean difference in the change in QTcI between tadalafil and placebo was 2.8 ms; tadalafil was equivalent to placebo (a priori, upper limit of 90% confidence interval < 10 ms [actual = 4.4 ms]; post hoc, upper limit of 95% confidence interval < 5 ms [actual = 4.8]). The active control, ibutilide, significantly increased QTcI by 6.9 and 8.9 ms compared with tadalafil and placebo, respectively. Similar statistical results were obtained with four additional QT correction methods. No subject had a QTcI > or = 450 ms or an increase in QTcI > or = 30 ms with any treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the a priori statistical test of equivalence, placebo and high-dose tadalafil produced equivalent effects on the QT interval. This study reliably discerned 5- to 10-ms changes in corrected QT in the ibutilide active control group.